best Transgender quotes images on Pinterest in | Thoughts, Words and Positive thoughts
quotes have been tagged as transgender: Ellen Wittlinger: 'People changed decriminalize consensual same sex relationships and end discrimination. I am in a relationship with a trans man, and have been for eight years now. We both identify as . Also my favorite quote on trans men and trans women couples: . A patient reported that her daughter was identifying as transgender. .. The following is a quote from an interview with Shappley. In a recent BBC radio program, one mother of a female-to-male (FtM) young person stated that this .. a kid anymore because they've ended the relationship with you or in.
Their grounds for taking this position — the prevalence of violence against women by men, the fact that men typically have certain biological features and have been socialised in a certain way, the fact that at least some of this seems to be true of many or even all trans women, and the fact that anyone can self-define as a woman, no matter how cynical or sinister their motivation — can all seem like unobjectionable, commonsense points which are decisive against proposals to reform the GRA to incorporate self-ID.
This is because the proposed changes to the GRA will have very little effect on whether and when trans people are able to access single-sex facilities and services. The current law, the Equality Act ofalready allows trans people to use the facilities and services that best align with their gender identity in almost all cases. This entitlement does not depend on having a GRC or on having received any particular medical treatment.
Again, this provision applies to all trans people including those who hold a GRC. A rare case in which having a GRC currently makes a difference in terms of access to women-only spaces concerns prisons, where, as we have seen, the procedure for placing trans prisoners into the male or the female estate is different depending on whether or not they have a GRC, although trans people without a GRC can still be placed in the estate that matches their gender identity following a case review.
- 6 Quotes From Influential Transgender People That Will Make You Think
- Marriage: A Transgender Man's Perspective
- “I’m not transphobic, but…”: A feminist case against the feminist case against trans inclusivity
What all of this means is that access to single-sex facilities and services is already governed by a principle of self-ID in almost all cases. The proposed reforms to the GRA will extend the principle of self-ID to cover legal documentation, which will have a positive effect for trans people themselves but will make no difference to which services trans people use, except in regard to prisons, where it may make a difference to where a prisoner is housed in a small number of cases.
The argument therefore has only a very tenuous connection to the proposed reforms to the law. However, it does not provide a particularly strong rebuttal to the argument, whose proponents may make several responses.
They may say that the changes to prison procedures alone give sufficient reason to be concerned about the changes in the law. Our view, however, is that the argument fails to establish any such incompatibility. The Basis of Risk The argument against trans-inclusivity starts from the observation that men pose a heightened risk of violence to women, compared to other women. We do not dispute that this is so. Now, we recognise that language in this area is contested and highly sensitive.
But it is certainly the case that some trans women - those who have not undertaken hormone therapy or genital surgery - do have the bodily features in question and thus are male in the sense that is in play in the argument we are considering, which is what matters for our purposes here. It is also clearly the case — virtually by definition, in fact — that trans women are people who have been classified as male, and treated in a way that reflects this, for some part of their lives.
We grant all of this.
But we dispute the claim that these features - either singly or in conjunction - are the correct basis for determining the risk that an individual poses in terms of violence against women. But do we need specific evidence for this? Some people might think it obvious that bodily differences such as genitals and hormones are the most likely candidate for the basis of the differential risk of violence between men and women. But there are good feminist reasons for not taking this for granted.
Many feminists have arguedsuccessfully in our view, that people in sexist societies are often very bad at distinguishing between differences that are the result of bodily features, and differences that are produced by social factors. For this reason, many feminists have preferred to emphasise the role of social factors in making men violent.
That trans women share in the socialisation that produces men seems still harder to deny than the claim that some of them share a male biology. So why expect trans women to be different from cis men in terms of their propensity to violence against women? Because, in short, trans women are different from cis men. The definitive difference is that trans women see themselves as women or even as female, and feel most comfortable navigating the social world with this gender presentation — many trans women report having this experience from very early childhood.
There is clearly a difference between the experience of a child who is treated by others in ways that are characteristic of boys and also feels like a boy, and a child who is treated by others in ways that are characteristic of boys whilst feeling that they are really a girl.
It is, to say the very least, not obvious that gender identity makes no difference to the way in which either biological and social factors manifest themselves. Given the vast body of feminist analyses of the ways in which cultural and social factors reproduce patriarchy, this would be an extraordinary claim for feminists to make.
What we are saying is that all sorts of variables combine and interact with the factors of having a certain anatomy and being classified as a certain gender on account of that anatomy, affecting — potentially profoundly — the way in which those factors shape us. We are saying that gender identity is among the factors which could, quite plausibly, make a difference. Because most studies and statistics concerning violence against women do not draw clear distinctions between cis men, trans men, and trans women, there is little empirical evidence on this point, and certainly none that rules out our hypothesis.
In light of this, feminist critics of self-ID are not justified in assuming that all or some trans women share with cis men the features in virtue of which the latter pose a higher risk of violence to women. The question, however, is what to do in the absence of knowledge.
But safe for whom?
This is where the feminist case against inclusivity may again turn out to rest on a circular pattern of reasoning. Research suggests trans people are more likely than cis people to experience homelessnessand trans women in particular are more likely to engage in sex work — both of which make a person more likely to experience sexual violence.
Would we advocate the same for other groups of women among whom cis women are included, should we find similar evidence of higher statistical likelihood of violence in their case? Or would we look for other ways to respond, ways to honour bonds of solidarity rather than resorting to exclusion? We would - or so we would hope. Nobody knows that my husband has died or that their dad has died.
Not only that, but I am having a difficult time dealing with all of this as well.
Lou Sullivan - Wikipedia
What a HUGE change! She is 47, and I am 53…. I share our story not to advocate that couples like us stay together—because every relationship is different and people should do what is right for them—but to encourage more acceptance from wives, parents, siblings, children, friends, colleagues.
I have heard firsthand too many heartbreaking stories of parents banishing their transgender children, wives not only leaving their husbands but breaking off all contact and fighting for sole custody of the children, adult children turning their backs on their transgender parents, and employers firing trans workers.
I understand the impulse. It was extremely difficult for me to comprehend, and adjust my life accordingly to, the realization that the man I had married—the very masculine, gorgeous, ideal, wonderful hunk of a man—would be no more. When we first started dating I was worried about coming out as transgender to her family. How would they take the news? Would they see me as a man? Would they support our relationship and treat us like anyone else? I thought back to when I came out to my own parents and siblings and how I was, at first, disowned by my dad, misunderstood by my mom, ignored by my sister, and received expressed concern from my brother.
Although my family has grown tremendously over the past decade, if they at first felt and reacted this way, how would my wife's family respond?
What I experienced from them was life-changing; they all proudly opened their arms to me, no judgment and no questions. Marriage didn't just join me with my wife, it joined me with people who have shown me unconditional love. Did you always want to get married? And if so, was this something you thought about as a child and young adult? It's difficult to think back to my childhood and my feelings around marriage, mainly, because I felt very confused by what marriage would look for me, especially since I didn't feel like a girl.
I grew up in the 80's in a rural Nebraska community. Back then, people didn't talk about being transgender, and any comments about being lesbian or gay were followed by shame or disgust. I had fantasies as a child of marrying both men and women, but both fantasies brought confused emotions for me. Marrying a boy would mean that I would be the one in the dress, I would be female, which didn't feel right.
Marrying a girl meant I was a lesbian, it reminded me that I was not the boy, which also made me feel uncomfortable. When I was a teenager, I had pushed down my feelings around being a boy and focused on my female identity. This identity was very uncomfortable for me and made me feel like I didn't belong in any group no matter what clothes I wore, what hairstyle I chose, or what boy I dated. In my relationships with boys, we would talk about marriage, but it was hard for me to see the actual wedding because I didn't want to wear a dress and I didn't want to become pregnant.
My dad would always joke that if I got married, I would most likely be wearing my basketball outfit and high tops underneath the wedding dress. We all would laugh while I secretly fantasized about just ditching the dress all together. As I moved into college, I began dating a guy that I would have married even though, in the end, I realized he wasn't that into me. When I fantasized about our wedding, I saw us both in jeans and hiking boots on top of a mountain.
The interesting thing with this fantasy is that I could see my clothes, but I couldn't see or feel me as a person. I felt completely detached and also disgusted by my body and female identity. But, I truly believed that if I married him, then all of these feelings would go away because marriage would mean that someone did love me and also show my community that I was a "normal" person.
After that relationship abruptly ended, I became undone and even more disgusted by my body, which unfortunately led me to unhealthy behaviors that quickly morphed into anorexia nervosa. My eating disorder ended all of my relationships: As anorexia took over my life, the thought of marriage also ended, until four years later when I began exploring and fantasizing more and more about being in a relationship with another woman. When you thought about marriage, did your image or fantasies about it change when you transitioned from Kimberly into Ryan?
After six years into recovery from anorexia, I came out as lesbian and started dating my first girlfriend. I wanted to marry her within the first few months. I wasn't interested in dating around because I believed that I was unattractive, so no one else would want to date me.Trans Women Ask Trans Men Questions
When my girlfriend and I talked about marriage, we both fantasized about having a beach wedding, being barefoot, and both being dressed in linen pants and shirts.
I wasn't out to my family as a lesbian at this time, and I also still felt uncomfortable in my female body, so it was difficult for me to fully get excited by the idea of having a wedding. I also live in a state that still doesn't recognize marriage equality, so when we talked about a wedding, a part of me felt disappointed since it "wouldn't count" or be recognized.
After eight months of dating my girlfriend, I came out as transgender, and then five months later I began my transition. I still wanted to marry her after my transition, and knew this time it would be recognized at the state and federal level since I was now recognized as a man. My girlfriend, however, went the opposite direction, and became scared of our relationship and hesitant about moving forward.
As we struggled in our relationship I again felt the reoccurring theme and belief surface within me; I believed I wasn't lovable, no matter how much I changed.
Trans Male Quotes. QuotesGram | FtM = Love | Pinterest | Transgender ftm, Transgender and Ftm
What's the most interesting thing you've learned about yourself, as a result of being married? All of my life I wanted to get married to prove to people that I was lovable, now I realize that the most important thing in life is loving yourself first.
The good news for my relationship is that I live with a hot-blooded Italian who is also a psychotherapist, so when I am being passive or holding in emotions, she doesn't let it last too long before she starts to push me into bringing out my thoughts and feelings.